Thursday, Daniel Abraham posted a brief essay on his blog entitled "In Defense of Exoticism" in which he examines the role exoticism plays in SFF. He defines exoticism as "the commodification of the Other, appropriating the thoughts or clothing or music or food or religion of an unfamiliar culture for the charm of the unfamiliar." He goes, in a wandering sort of way, to discuss some other aspects of this thought, specifically the concept of Other. And when I say in a wandering way, I in no way intend anything derogatory. Abraham himself says he's still thinking this topic through and his post would be a little rough around the edges, and I respect that.
But this essay got me thinking. What's wrong with the charm of the unfamiliar? And where are we to find it, if not in other cultures, epochs, music, etc. Now I realize that the key verb in Abraham's sentence is "commodification" and that is sometimes in the eye of the beholder. That's not a debate I want to get into at this point. Instead, my thoughts went down a different avenue.
But this essay got me thinking. What's wrong with the charm of the unfamiliar? And where are we to find it, if not in other cultures, epochs, music, etc. Now I realize that the key verb in Abraham's sentence is "commodification" and that is sometimes in the eye of the beholder. That's not a debate I want to get into at this point. Instead, my thoughts went down a different avenue.
